Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

½Ã¸àÆ® °ø°£ÀÌ ÀûÃþ °¡°øÀ¸·Î Á¦ÀÛÇÑ Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ ÇϺα¸Á¶¹°ÀÇ º¯¿¬ ¹× ³»¸é ÀûÇÕµµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

Effect of cement space on marginal and internal fit of a zirconia core fabricated using by additive manufacturing

´ëÇÑÄ¡°ú±â°øÇÐȸÁö 2024³â 46±Ç 1È£ p.1 ~ 7
¹ÎÁö¿ø, ±è¼¼¿¬, ±èÀçÈ«,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹ÎÁö¿ø ( Min Ji-Won ) - 
±è¼¼¿¬ ( Kim Se-Yeon ) - 
±èÀçÈ« ( Kim Jae-Hong ) - 

Abstract


Purpose: The goal of this study was to determine the clinical acceptability of various cement space settings for the marginal and internal fit of a zirconia core manufactured using additive manufacturing.

Methods: The maxillary right incisor served as the master model. After scanning the maxillary right incisor with a dental 3D (three-dimensional) scanner, the stereo lithography file was created using different cement space settings of 40, 120, and 200 ¥ìm using computer- aided design software (Dental System 2018; 3Shape). The marginal and internal fit of the 3 groups were determined using the silicon replica technique. Measurement points were divided into the following three categories: margin, axial wall, and incisal. To ensure more accurate measurements, these three measurement points were divided into 8 points.
The Shapiro-Wilk, one-way ANOVA, and Tukey¡¯s honestly significant difference test (for all tests ¥á=0.05) were the statistical analyses that were included in the study.

Results: The CS (cement space)-200 group had better marginal and internal fit than the CS-40 and CS-120 groups, and there were statistically significant differences at the marginal and incisal points, except for the axial wall points. CS-200 group, both marginal and internal fit were within 120 ¥ìm, which is the clinically acceptable value.

Conclusion: This study suggests that a 200 ¥ìm cement space setting is ideal for optimal marginal and internal fit of 3D-printed ceramic crowns.

Å°¿öµå

Additive manufacturing; Cement space; Marginal and internal fit; Silicone replica technique

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸